Technical audit & compliance
Without technical amnesia proof, your AI is not fundable
BPI, PIIEC, AI Act: they all require amnesia proof. Mathematical proof that your system forgets data after processing. Not a diagram. Not a pitch. Binary, sealed, opposable evidence.
The proof gap: 90% of AI applications fail in the same place
It's not a technology problem. It's a proof problem. The evaluator opens your file, looks for independent certification, doesn't find it. File closed. Here are the four gaps that cause funding and compliance requests to fail.
No RAM amnesia proof
Your AI processes sensitive data (PII, IBAN, trade secrets). After the session, what remains in memory? You don't know. The evaluator doesn't either. File rejected.
No integrity certificate
Your internal audit results aren't cryptographically signed. Anyone can modify a PDF. BPI and PIIEC committees know this.
No sovereignty proof
Your system is "sovereign"? Prove it. Not with an architecture diagram. With a network scan showing zero calls to US jurisdiction (Cloud Act).
No independent third party
You self-certify. The BPI committee, PIIEC, and AI Act Article 10 require a technical trust tier. Not your CTO. Not your DPO. An external auditor.
What you submit today vs what the evaluator expects
The difference between a rejected and an eligible application lies in the nature of the documents provided. Here's the concrete comparison.
| Your logs & internal audits | SCANALIS report | |
|---|---|---|
| PIIEC / BPI eligibility | Rejected by evaluators | 88/100 score documented |
| Value to funding committee | None | Opposable technical proof |
| Document integrity | Hash modifiable after the fact | SHA-256 seal + RSA-PSS 2048 bits |
| Trust tier | Self-certification | Independent technical auditor |
| Proof of no residue | Declarative ("our system purges") | 8 canary tokens injected + post-purge memory scan |
| Gaia-X compliance | Not documented | Trust Framework §4.2, §5.1, §6.1 |
The Canary Protocol: we don't secure your AI, we prove it forgets
How do you technically prove that no sensitive data persists in memory after processing? SCANALIS uses a forensic method in four steps, with no subjective interpretation: a binary verdict, timestamped, reproducible.
The sealed report (SHA-256 + RSA-PSS) constitutes the independent technical proof required by BPI evaluators, PIIEC committees, and AI Act Article 10 auditors.
4 pillars, 1 opposable proof
Each pillar produces verifiable evidence. Not an opinion. Not a recommendation. Binary, timestamped, sealed proof.
Exposure Intelligence
Shadow APIs, unauthorized outbound flows, DLI v2. Your real exposure surface, mapped and quantified in euros. You know exactly where you're vulnerable.
Canary Protocol
Injection of 8 canary tokens. Purge. Byte-by-byte forensic scan. Binary verdict: AMNESIA_CONFIRMED or AMNESIA_FAILED. Zero interpretation.
Monte Carlo + IPE
Stochastic simulation of financial impact. IPE (Exposure Probability Index) calibrated to Scanalis Prudence Standard. You quantify risk in euros.
Cryptographic seal
32-page report. SHA-256 hash. RSA-PSS 2048-bit signature. Embedded public key for offline verification by any third party. Guaranteed non-repudiation.
SCANALIS vs the 2026 ecosystem
Not a SaaS that generates noise. A trust tier that produces proof. Here's how SCANALIS positions against alternatives.
| Dimension | Automated SaaS | ✦ SCANALIS | Manual pentest |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAM amnesia proof | Non-existent | Canary Protocol 8 tokens | Out of scope |
| Cryptographic seal | Simple hash | SHA-256 + RSA-PSS | Unsigned PDF |
| BPI/PIIEC eligibility | Not recognized | 88/100 score | Variable |
| Production impact | Agent (risky) | Zero impact | Intrusive |
| Gaia-X compliance | Not covered | §4.2, §5.1, §6.1 | Not covered |
| Remediation deliverable | Dashboard | 30/60/90-day plan + scripts | Static PDF report |
Use cases: who benefits from SCANALIS
Discover concrete situations where independent technical proof makes the difference between an approved and a rejected application.
AI startup / Fundraising
"We're targeting PIIEC funding of 2 to 5 M€"
Your application will be read by a committee looking for independent technical certification. Without RAM amnesia proof and a cryptographic seal, 90% of applications are rejected. SCANALIS provides the opposable report that proves your AI forgets data — and unlocks your eligibility.
Compliance firm / DPO
"We want to differentiate with concrete evidence"
Your clients ask for GDPR audits, but compliance often stays documentary. By adding a SCANALIS technical brick (Shadow APIs, data leak, prompt injection), you deliver a sealed report executives can present in committee. A differentiating factor against competition.
IT Director / Enterprise
"Our AI system is subject to AI Act Article 10"
AI Act requires documented management of persistent data for high-risk systems. An architecture diagram isn't enough. SCANALIS provides forensic proof (Canary Protocol) and network sovereignty scan — avoiding potential fines and reassuring the executive committee.
SaaS vendor / Data governance
"We must prove sovereignty for Gaia-X"
The Gaia-X Trust Framework requires zero Cloud Act dependency and documented compliance. A Scanalis network scan shows absence of calls to US jurisdictions. The SHA-256 + RSA-PSS sealed report documents your compliance for sovereign tenders.
Bank / Insurance / DORA
"DORA requires proof of operational resilience"
The financial sector must prove system robustness. SCANALIS provides a technical risk map (Exposure Intelligence), Monte Carlo simulation, and opposable report — elements expected by supervisors to demonstrate controlled data governance.
Our process: 30 minutes to assess if your architecture can produce the required amnesia proof
A free scoping call. External intervention that doesn't touch production. An opposable report in 15 days.
Free 30-min scoping call
Eligibility + scope. Identification of critical flows, AI/API stack, and funding objective (BPI, PIIEC, raise). SCANALIS works with a limited number of partners per quarter. → Go/No-Go + personalized roadmap.
Audit T+5 to T+12 days
Canary Protocol + scan. Canary injection, memory scan, sovereignty verification, Monte Carlo simulation. Zero production impact. No access to internal systems. → Map + binary proofs.
Delivery T+15 days
Sealed 32-page report + briefing. SHA-256 + RSA-PSS seal. Presentation to your committee or PIIEC team. Correction scripts ready to deploy. → Opposable proof for BPI evaluator.
Standards covered
AI Act, GDPR, DORA, Gaia-X, OWASP API Top 10, NIS2. Bpifrance and France 2030 programmes. Technical data governance and compliance.
Your application will be read in 90 days. With or without proof. 30 minutes of scoping. Free. To find out if your AI architecture can produce the amnesia proof required by BPI, PIIEC, and AI Act.
30 minutes to assess if your architecture can produce the required amnesia proof
Free scoping call. Zero production impact. Identify critical flows and your BPI, PIIEC and AI Act eligibility.
Book a free 30-min scoping callWhy RAHIZI partners with SCANALIS
RAHIZI is a legaltech platform. Our clients — law firms, enterprises, startups — increasingly need to demonstrate AI compliance for GDPR, AI Act, and funding applications (BPI, PIIEC). Yet regulation requires technical proof, not attestations.
We formed this partnership with SCANALIS to bridge that gap: legal and regulatory framing on one side, opposable forensic proof on the other. A coherent offering for those preparing funding applications or proving AI compliance.
English 
French 
Spanish 
Portuguese 
Russian 
Chinese 
Dutch 
Italian 
Danish 
Greek 
Finnish 
Hindi 
Japanese 
Korean